Dienhart: Big Ten excited to put tourney in D.C.

WASHINGTON – Yesterday, it was New York. Today, it’s Washington. Welcome to the new Big Ten Eastern Wing. Soon after it was announced in 2012 that Rutgers and Maryland were joining the league, Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany pledged to build a bridge to the conference’s newcomers.

One was built yesterday with the announcement of Dave Gavitt Tipoff Series between the Big Ten and Big East. Another bridge was officially constructed today, with the announcement that the 2017 Big Ten men’s basketball tourney—the 20th in history–is coming to the Verizon Center in Washington, D.C.

Since its inception in 1998, the Big Ten basketball tournament has alternated between Chicago and Indianapolis, so this move to Washington, D.C., will be a sharp turn from what has been the routine. Maryland coach Mark Turgeon sounds relieved to be joining the Big Ten after two seasons as a “short-timer” in the ACC.

“We are excited about it,” said Turgeon. “It’s great to have a home. Jim Delany has been a man of his word in making us feel welcome. Having this event here is part of that. ”

No doubt, this will be a big change for the Big Ten, whose roots run deep in the Midwest.

“People struggle with change but we look for progressive, positive momentum to move forward,” said Delany.

So, embrace change, Big Ten Nation. Time is marching on in this new Big Ten world that now will feature an anchor event on the Eastern Seaboard. Expect more, as Delany has alluded to coming announcements in the next “60 days.” Some of those surely will entail news of events out East.

“This basketball tourney will rotate between the Midwest and East,” Delany said. “The ratio is unknown, but there will be a rotation. We will be here regularly in coming years.

“This is our first chance to put an event like this in the Eastern Corridor. We will undoubtedly be back in Indianapolis and Chicago. But we couldn’t be more excited to put this event here.”

What makes Chicago—host eight times and again in 2015–and Indianapolis—host nine times and again in 2016–ideal are their central locations in respect to many Big Ten schools. Fans from most institutions can drive to either city with relative ease. But with the event moving to the Verizon Center after 19 years in Chicago and Indy, most Big Ten campuses will be beyond a reasonable driving distance.

How will that impact attendance? It’s difficult to tell at this point. But Delany felt the Big Ten needed to take one of its marquee events and play it in a new area the conference has expanded into. Why expand into new regions if you don’t plan to take advantage of them?

“It is important to show that we are here,” said Delany, who earlier hatched a deal to begin sending a Big Ten team to the Pinstripe Bowl at Yankee Stadium beginning this season. “To be there, you have to live there. And this is a step in that direction.”

It’s about branding a Big Ten presence in the Beltway area. And this 2017 Big Ten basketball tournament will help do just that. The Big Ten even will have a satellite office presence in Washington, D.C., not far from the White House, in addition to a brick-and-mortar presence in Manhattan.

The Big Ten already has an underrated presence in this area. A Washington Post story from 2012 indicated that there are 91,000 Big Ten alums in the Washington, D.C. area. Michigan tops the list with 15,000 alums in the area, followed by Penn State (12,000), Indiana (10,750), Michigan State (10,500), Ohio State (9,400), Wisconsin (8,490) and Illinois (8,000). And, of course, Maryland’s College Park campus isn’t far from here. No doubt, those robust alumni numbers figure to bode well for the tourney’s attendance.

“This will help us enhance and increase our presence in the area,” said Delany. “We will be able to tap into the ex-patriot fans who live here.”

Moving hoops tourneys to multiple sites isn’t unparallelled. The ACC and SEC frequently move their basketball tourneys. The ACC usually plays its event in Greensboro, N.C., but will play in the Verizon Center in 2016 and at the Barclay’s Center in Brooklyn in 2017. The SEC in recent years has had Atlanta as an anchor but also has played its hoops tourney in Nashville, New Orleans and Tampa. Soon, the Big Ten will add a third venue. And, perhaps more later.

“We came here not to visit, but to make an impact,” said Delany.

About Tom Dienhart BTN.com senior writer Tom Dienhart is a veteran sports journalist who covers Big Ten football and men’s basketball for BTN.com and BTN TV. Find him on Twitter and Facebook, read all of his work at btn.com/tomdienhart, and subscribe to his posts via RSS. Also, send questions to his weekly mailbag using the form below and read all of his previous answers in his reader mailbag section.

And if you want to leave a comment on this post, use the box below. All comments need to be approved by a moderator.


Your Opinion?
Show Comments (10 Comments)
dgpgrove on 5/6/2014 @ 3:11pm EDT Said:

What an idiotic move. Nebraska 1200 mi., Minnesota 1100 mi., Iowa 900 mi., Wisconsin 850 mi., Northwestern 710 mi., Mich. St. 590 mi., Michigan 520, Purdue 530 mi., Indiana 620 mi., Ohio St. 400 mi., Penn State 200 mi., Rutgers 200 mi., Maryland 10 mi. What about those distances makes sense when the Big Ten had to give away seats in Indianapolis?

JP on 5/6/2014 @ 3:55pm EDT Said:


Rosalie Gruenemeyer Suggs on 5/6/2014 @ 4:12pm EDT Said:

I agree with the previous two responses. I was in attendance to the Women’s Basketball Tournament this year held in Indianapolis at Bankers Life Fieldhouse. The women do NOT draw nearly the large crowds that the guys do but nevertheless, the house was nearly empty on Sunday afternoon for the championship game save the small contingent of fans for each team. I can totally envision that fan bases will NOT want to spend the money it will cost to attend a game in D.C. Aside from the cost of the tickets, the cost of travel, food and lodging is significantly more expensive inside the beltway. If the Big Ten is looking for maximum exposure, that they will get. A large attendance from each of the fan bases they are not likely to see.

Dave Dorn on 5/6/2014 @ 4:44pm EDT Said:

As long as they don’t plan on moving Football it should do alright, since fans will still be there to see the games, just not a lot of B10 Fans unfortunately, imo.

realwriter24 on 5/6/2014 @ 5:35pm EDT Said:

Midwesterners have been ignored and mocked by easterners for decades, at least the five I have been on the planet. Now, in the name of “progressivism” we are supposed to be giddy with joy and excitement to turn over the miniscule respect we have had as a midwestern success story. Why we willingly shoot ourselves in the foot I will never understand or appreciate. Bringing Nebraska into the Big Ten made perfect sense. Penn State, Rutgers, Maryland makes no sense to me at all and is souring my enthusiasm for the conference. I love playing Big East Comference teams and doing things like that, but demolishing our identity? Just have no interest.

Glenn on 5/6/2014 @ 7:32pm EDT Said:

I understand the reasoning but most of the Big Ten fans won’t like it. Unfortunately the money is where its at and the conference is rolling out an early welcome mat but this makes about as much sense as Omaha hosting the tournament. Either pick a central location such as Indianapolis, which is really the best option or rotate the thing each year over 10 years to suit all the conference teams. Here’s hoping the league takes a hit and the fans send a message.

Rod on 5/7/2014 @ 12:01am EDT Said:

This is one of the most unfair moves the B1G has done yet. Iowa, Nebraska, Minnesota, Illinois and even Northwestern have been a staple of the Big Ten for decades. Where is the love for these schools. To hell with the East Coast. Let’s play that tourney in Iowa City, Minneapolis, Madison or Lincoln before going east. We deserve a little notoriety for Pete’s sake. Maryland and Rutgers have yet to play a game in the conference. Money greed.
Dance with the one that brought ya!

Mary on 5/7/2014 @ 10:36am EDT Said:

I’m glad the Big Ten office is excited, because it certainly didn’t do a thing for the fan base that attends the games and tournament.

Greg Z on 5/7/2014 @ 11:41am EDT Said:

Unfortunately, Delaney is a business man first and a sports fan somewhere much less. I would prefer a sports man first for an AD. Considering the lack of interest for college sports in our new markets, I’d think Delaney would try to be more of a centralist.

DaHook on 5/7/2014 @ 12:14pm EDT Said:

This is a new day folks, get used to it !!! It will only strengthen the basketball part of the B1G with a lot of potential student athletes from Baltimore/DC and NYC blueprint that will be exposed to the conference. For football, I agree we should keep that in the Midwest. I hope they look for other cities, such as Cincy(Paul Brown Stadium),Detroit(Ford Field),and even at Heinz Field in Pittsburgh. I know that most of you would not agree with me, but this is a good step for basketball to keep up with the ACC. You want the product to continue to get better not stale. The “mighty B1G” has to move with the times before they get squeezed out!