http://btn.com/2012/12/20/big-ten-geeks-should-everyone-get-to-play-in-the-tournament/ BTN.com is the official Big Ten sports site of TV's Big Ten Network. Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:28:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://btn.com/2012/12/20/big-ten-geeks-should-everyone-get-to-play-in-the-tournament/#comment-135891 Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:47:10 +0000 http://btn.com/?p=92585#comment-135891 Problem is, it should be a round robin format, otherwise only the top 2 or 4 teams get byes and someone like Nebraska(women) last year had to try to wind 4-5 games in a row- that is hard and in the championship game, the Huskers wore out against a fresh team. That’s not fair. all teams play same format-:)

]]> http://btn.com/2012/12/20/big-ten-geeks-should-everyone-get-to-play-in-the-tournament/#comment-135836 Sat, 22 Dec 2012 17:44:56 +0000 http://btn.com/?p=92585#comment-135836 Keep it to 4 days at the venue, but have the four lower teams play on Tursday in home courts.

]]> http://btn.com/2012/12/20/big-ten-geeks-should-everyone-get-to-play-in-the-tournament/#comment-135314 Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:37:58 +0000 http://btn.com/?p=92585#comment-135314 What was done before Nebraska entered? or Penn State? If all teams participated then, then all teams participate now. Seems like a silly question, to me.

]]> http://btn.com/2012/12/20/big-ten-geeks-should-everyone-get-to-play-in-the-tournament/#comment-135303 Fri, 21 Dec 2012 06:14:41 +0000 http://btn.com/?p=92585#comment-135303 As long as the regular season champ(s) continue to be crowned Big Ten champs, I don’t think there is any harm in either approach. I narrowly prefer just 12 teams though. I say that because that will make the competition for #10-12 interesting at the end of the regular season (more so than a #11/14 and #12/13 tournament game will be interesting).

]]> http://btn.com/2012/12/20/big-ten-geeks-should-everyone-get-to-play-in-the-tournament/#comment-135258 Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:15:40 +0000 http://btn.com/?p=92585#comment-135258 Yes.

]]>