<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What should happen to Big Ten divisions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://btn.com/2012/12/10/what-should-happen-to-big-ten-divisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://btn.com/2012/12/10/what-should-happen-to-big-ten-divisions/</link>
	<description>BTN.com is the official Big Ten sports site of TV&#039;s Big Ten Network.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:48:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://btn.com/2012/12/10/what-should-happen-to-big-ten-divisions/#comment-132203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btn.com/?p=90292#comment-132203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michigan                                                          OSU
Michigan State                                                 Wisc
Rutgers                                                             Penn State
Ill                                                                       Maryland
Ind.                                                                    Iowa
Northwestern                                                     Minnesota]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michigan                                                          OSU<br />
Michigan State                                                 Wisc<br />
Rutgers                                                             Penn State<br />
Ill                                                                       Maryland<br />
Ind.                                                                    Iowa<br />
Northwestern                                                     Minnesota</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://btn.com/2012/12/10/what-should-happen-to-big-ten-divisions/#comment-131454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 02:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btn.com/?p=90292#comment-131454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should be a East/West Split:
West:
Minnesota
Wisconsin
Iowa
Nebraska
Michigan State
Northwestern
Illinois

East:
Michigan
Maryland
Indiana
Purdue
Ohio St.
Penn St.
Rutgers

Lose Michigan/Michigan St. game occasionally though...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should be a East/West Split:<br />
West:<br />
Minnesota<br />
Wisconsin<br />
Iowa<br />
Nebraska<br />
Michigan State<br />
Northwestern<br />
Illinois</p>
<p>East:<br />
Michigan<br />
Maryland<br />
Indiana<br />
Purdue<br />
Ohio St.<br />
Penn St.<br />
Rutgers</p>
<p>Lose Michigan/Michigan St. game occasionally though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff in Nebraska</title>
		<link>http://btn.com/2012/12/10/what-should-happen-to-big-ten-divisions/#comment-131399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff in Nebraska]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btn.com/?p=90292#comment-131399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What Gray ? Decline it&#039;s obvious you dont look at it objectively. Again Nebraska is 12-5 since joining conference so in them 2 years what are Osu Psu and Michigan in that spand ? Also Wisconsin been in title both years and won. Osu 6-7 last year and both years do count along with all conference games. Research Gray before statements , k. Try not to show bias as well ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Gray ? Decline it&#8217;s obvious you dont look at it objectively. Again Nebraska is 12-5 since joining conference so in them 2 years what are Osu Psu and Michigan in that spand ? Also Wisconsin been in title both years and won. Osu 6-7 last year and both years do count along with all conference games. Research Gray before statements , k. Try not to show bias as well ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff in Nebraska</title>
		<link>http://btn.com/2012/12/10/what-should-happen-to-big-ten-divisions/#comment-131393</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff in Nebraska]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btn.com/?p=90292#comment-131393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Division changes will be determine a little bit by who else joins?There can be many formats so  we will just have to wait .Likely an east west format would be nice. Welcome Rutgers and Maryland to the Conference. Name change would be more fitting as well maybe it will be there ol Name or something? Waitin on the other 2 schools as well will factor in too ?Who ever wins division will have a Name as well for trophy and for Title as well. Three names come to mind Hayes Schembechler and Osborne also Stagg Bierman and so forth....too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Division changes will be determine a little bit by who else joins?There can be many formats so  we will just have to wait .Likely an east west format would be nice. Welcome Rutgers and Maryland to the Conference. Name change would be more fitting as well maybe it will be there ol Name or something? Waitin on the other 2 schools as well will factor in too ?Who ever wins division will have a Name as well for trophy and for Title as well. Three names come to mind Hayes Schembechler and Osborne also Stagg Bierman and so forth&#8230;.too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff in Nebraska</title>
		<link>http://btn.com/2012/12/10/what-should-happen-to-big-ten-divisions/#comment-131382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff in Nebraska]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btn.com/?p=90292#comment-131382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like it or not ol Big Ten faithfuls Nebraska is one of the Top football schools in the conference.They have beatin everyone in the conference that they have played in the last  2 years.Not played(Indiana,Purdue and the Illini) In that spand they are 12 and 5 so whats the others record in that spand ? I realize they have played some bad road games(4 routes) in order to win a conference title that must improved that ASAP. Need less to say they are B10 contenders and they will be there again next year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like it or not ol Big Ten faithfuls Nebraska is one of the Top football schools in the conference.They have beatin everyone in the conference that they have played in the last  2 years.Not played(Indiana,Purdue and the Illini) In that spand they are 12 and 5 so whats the others record in that spand ? I realize they have played some bad road games(4 routes) in order to win a conference title that must improved that ASAP. Need less to say they are B10 contenders and they will be there again next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zenk</title>
		<link>http://btn.com/2012/12/10/what-should-happen-to-big-ten-divisions/#comment-131338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Zenk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btn.com/?p=90292#comment-131338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Go to a nine game conference schedule with three nonconference games, best for fans and BCS consideration. Lose &quot;Leaders&quot; and &quot;Legends.&quot; Simply go Big 10 East/Big 10 West.  East Division : Penn State, Rutgers, Maryland, Ohio State, Purdue, Indiana, Michigan State. West Division: Nebraska, Iowa, Illinois, Northwestern, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan.  With a nine game conference schedule, each team plays six division games, three opposite division games thereby preserving all in-state and traditional rivalries.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go to a nine game conference schedule with three nonconference games, best for fans and BCS consideration. Lose &#8220;Leaders&#8221; and &#8220;Legends.&#8221; Simply go Big 10 East/Big 10 West.  East Division : Penn State, Rutgers, Maryland, Ohio State, Purdue, Indiana, Michigan State. West Division: Nebraska, Iowa, Illinois, Northwestern, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan.  With a nine game conference schedule, each team plays six division games, three opposite division games thereby preserving all in-state and traditional rivalries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Baxter (@richbaxteraz)</title>
		<link>http://btn.com/2012/12/10/what-should-happen-to-big-ten-divisions/#comment-131277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich Baxter (@richbaxteraz)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btn.com/?p=90292#comment-131277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want it to break out as east/west, with the split coming in Illinois rather than Indiana. That will allow the conference to drop protected crossovers, which is imperative if they you at eight conference games and desirable even if you go to nine. Splitting up OSU/PSU/Michigan/Nebraska two and two seems superfluous, especially considering the ongoing success of Wisconsin and the difficulties in Happy Valley.

Team (Season Ending Rival)

E
Rutgers (MSU)
Maryland (PSU)
PSU (MD)
OSU (M)
MSU (Rutgers)
Michigan (OSU)
Northwestern (Illinois - in the years they play)

W
Indiana (Purdue)
Purdue (Indiana)
Illinois (Northwestern - in the years they play)
Wisconsin (MN)
Minnesota (WI)
Iowa (NE)
Nebraska (IA)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want it to break out as east/west, with the split coming in Illinois rather than Indiana. That will allow the conference to drop protected crossovers, which is imperative if they you at eight conference games and desirable even if you go to nine. Splitting up OSU/PSU/Michigan/Nebraska two and two seems superfluous, especially considering the ongoing success of Wisconsin and the difficulties in Happy Valley.</p>
<p>Team (Season Ending Rival)</p>
<p>E<br />
Rutgers (MSU)<br />
Maryland (PSU)<br />
PSU (MD)<br />
OSU (M)<br />
MSU (Rutgers)<br />
Michigan (OSU)<br />
Northwestern (Illinois &#8211; in the years they play)</p>
<p>W<br />
Indiana (Purdue)<br />
Purdue (Indiana)<br />
Illinois (Northwestern &#8211; in the years they play)<br />
Wisconsin (MN)<br />
Minnesota (WI)<br />
Iowa (NE)<br />
Nebraska (IA)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray</title>
		<link>http://btn.com/2012/12/10/what-should-happen-to-big-ten-divisions/#comment-131203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btn.com/?p=90292#comment-131203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Competitive balance&quot; is a relative concept. With the exception of Ohio State, and perhaps Michigan and Penn State, the remaining B1G football programs fall into two categories: improvement and decline.

Arguably, Nebraska is in a state of decline. Where the Huskers were once a perennial powerhouse, the last decade or so has not been so kind. The same can be said of Penn State. Though not as bad as predicted, the 2012 Nittany Lions probably enjoyed their last winning season for 3-5 years due to heavy NCAA sanctions.

Wisconsin has dominated the conference in recent years. Northwestern has steadily improved their yearly win total thanks, primarily, to a passionate head coach. Meanwhile, past up-and-comers like Iowa Michigan State appear to live or die based on the talent behind center.

In short, the appreciation of competitive balance should set aside when structuring divisions. More travel-friendly divisional makeups will vastly improve attendance while fostering geographic rivalries.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Competitive balance&#8221; is a relative concept. With the exception of Ohio State, and perhaps Michigan and Penn State, the remaining B1G football programs fall into two categories: improvement and decline.</p>
<p>Arguably, Nebraska is in a state of decline. Where the Huskers were once a perennial powerhouse, the last decade or so has not been so kind. The same can be said of Penn State. Though not as bad as predicted, the 2012 Nittany Lions probably enjoyed their last winning season for 3-5 years due to heavy NCAA sanctions.</p>
<p>Wisconsin has dominated the conference in recent years. Northwestern has steadily improved their yearly win total thanks, primarily, to a passionate head coach. Meanwhile, past up-and-comers like Iowa Michigan State appear to live or die based on the talent behind center.</p>
<p>In short, the appreciation of competitive balance should set aside when structuring divisions. More travel-friendly divisional makeups will vastly improve attendance while fostering geographic rivalries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://btn.com/2012/12/10/what-should-happen-to-big-ten-divisions/#comment-131074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btn.com/?p=90292#comment-131074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Add Notre Dame and Boston College for TV markets, football and hockey! 6 schools is a little small for hockey but 8 is great! As for the divisions:

Legends
Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, Northwestern

Leaders
Illinois, Indiana, Ohio State, Wisconsin

Liberty
Boston College, Maryland, Penn State, Rutgers

Legacy
Michigan, Michigan State, Notre Dame, Purdue]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add Notre Dame and Boston College for TV markets, football and hockey! 6 schools is a little small for hockey but 8 is great! As for the divisions:</p>
<p>Legends<br />
Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, Northwestern</p>
<p>Leaders<br />
Illinois, Indiana, Ohio State, Wisconsin</p>
<p>Liberty<br />
Boston College, Maryland, Penn State, Rutgers</p>
<p>Legacy<br />
Michigan, Michigan State, Notre Dame, Purdue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://btn.com/2012/12/10/what-should-happen-to-big-ten-divisions/#comment-130810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btn.com/?p=90292#comment-130810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope they do the sandwich method.  It&#039;s got competitive balance, keeps close teams, and preserves almost every major rivalry.  It also requires no locked crossovers so even at 8 games, we can play teams in the other division 2 out of 7 years instead of 2 out 12.

East and West Division:  Penn State, Maryland, Rutgers, Nebraska, Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota
Central Division:  Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State, Illinois, Northwestern, Purdue, Indiana]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they do the sandwich method.  It&#8217;s got competitive balance, keeps close teams, and preserves almost every major rivalry.  It also requires no locked crossovers so even at 8 games, we can play teams in the other division 2 out of 7 years instead of 2 out 12.</p>
<p>East and West Division:  Penn State, Maryland, Rutgers, Nebraska, Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota<br />
Central Division:  Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State, Illinois, Northwestern, Purdue, Indiana</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
