<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maryland set to join Big Ten in 2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://btn.com/2012/11/19/maryland-set-to-join-big-ten-in-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://btn.com/2012/11/19/maryland-set-to-join-big-ten-in-2014/</link>
	<description>BTN.com is the official Big Ten sports site of TV&#039;s Big Ten Network.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 22:11:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aroznowski</title>
		<link>http://btn.com/2012/11/19/maryland-set-to-join-big-ten-in-2014/#comment-115569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aroznowski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 02:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btn.com/?p=84600#comment-115569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not really a fan of this. Maryland and Rutgers just don&#039;t seem to be good fits in the way that Nebraska was a year and a half ago. Being the traditionalist that I am that values the great, long history and pageantry of the Big Ten Conference, this comes as a sudden shock. The conference was founded back in 1896. By 1917, the conference had ten members (Chicago, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Northwestern, Ohio State, Purdue, and Wisconsin). The conference was stable for about thirty years until Chicago left in 1946 and Michigan State joined in 1950. The conference was stable for about forty more years until Penn State joined in 1990. It was stable for about twenty more years after that until Nebraska joined in 2011. There really should have been a period of at least two decades until the Big Ten considered expanding beyond twelve members. With that said, the only sport that reaps massive benefits from adding Maryland and likely Rutgers is lacrosse. The Big Ten would have five schools (Maryland, Michigan, Ohio State, Penn State, and Rutgers) with men&#039;s lacrosse teams and six schools (Maryland, Michigan, Northwestern, Ohio State, Penn State, and Rutgers) with women&#039;s lacrosse teams going forward. The Big Ten would be able to sponsor women&#039;s lacrosse and would need just one more program in order to sponsor men&#039;s lacrosse. At this point, it might be in the conference&#039;s best interest to add Johns Hopkins as a lacrosse-only member to boost the number of men&#039;s and women&#039;s lacrosse programs to six and seven, respectively. Lacrosse is the only sport that Johns Hopkins has at the Division I level. The rest of its sports are in Division III. Maryland and Johns Hopkins have a great rivalry on the lacrosse field. Johns Hopkins is also an elite academic institution that could be added to the CIC to boost the number of CIC schools to sixteen. I have probably rambled on enough by now. While I do so reluctantly, I would like to welcome Maryland and likely Rutgers to the Big Ten Conference. At the very least, the Terrapins and Scarlet Knights deserve a chance to prove themselves, and I will definitely allow them that chance. Maryland and Rutgers fans, you better be proud and honored to be joining the best collegiate athletic conference in the country.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not really a fan of this. Maryland and Rutgers just don&#8217;t seem to be good fits in the way that Nebraska was a year and a half ago. Being the traditionalist that I am that values the great, long history and pageantry of the Big Ten Conference, this comes as a sudden shock. The conference was founded back in 1896. By 1917, the conference had ten members (Chicago, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Northwestern, Ohio State, Purdue, and Wisconsin). The conference was stable for about thirty years until Chicago left in 1946 and Michigan State joined in 1950. The conference was stable for about forty more years until Penn State joined in 1990. It was stable for about twenty more years after that until Nebraska joined in 2011. There really should have been a period of at least two decades until the Big Ten considered expanding beyond twelve members. With that said, the only sport that reaps massive benefits from adding Maryland and likely Rutgers is lacrosse. The Big Ten would have five schools (Maryland, Michigan, Ohio State, Penn State, and Rutgers) with men&#8217;s lacrosse teams and six schools (Maryland, Michigan, Northwestern, Ohio State, Penn State, and Rutgers) with women&#8217;s lacrosse teams going forward. The Big Ten would be able to sponsor women&#8217;s lacrosse and would need just one more program in order to sponsor men&#8217;s lacrosse. At this point, it might be in the conference&#8217;s best interest to add Johns Hopkins as a lacrosse-only member to boost the number of men&#8217;s and women&#8217;s lacrosse programs to six and seven, respectively. Lacrosse is the only sport that Johns Hopkins has at the Division I level. The rest of its sports are in Division III. Maryland and Johns Hopkins have a great rivalry on the lacrosse field. Johns Hopkins is also an elite academic institution that could be added to the CIC to boost the number of CIC schools to sixteen. I have probably rambled on enough by now. While I do so reluctantly, I would like to welcome Maryland and likely Rutgers to the Big Ten Conference. At the very least, the Terrapins and Scarlet Knights deserve a chance to prove themselves, and I will definitely allow them that chance. Maryland and Rutgers fans, you better be proud and honored to be joining the best collegiate athletic conference in the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
