<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Ten Geeks: Is Indiana No. 1?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://btn.com/2012/11/09/is-indiana-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://btn.com/2012/11/09/is-indiana-1/</link>
	<description>BTN.com is the official Big Ten sports site of TV&#039;s Big Ten Network.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:35:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Muldoon</title>
		<link>http://btn.com/2012/11/09/is-indiana-1/#comment-112606</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Muldoon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btn.com/?p=81854#comment-112606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s always important to look at stats, but sometimes you&#039;ve got to question what&#039;s going on at the human level.  How many of those 40%+ 3pt. teams, for example, lost/kept their top three shooters?  My gut tells me personnel changes have as much (or more) to do with shooting percentage changes than do the normative powers of statistical means.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always important to look at stats, but sometimes you&#8217;ve got to question what&#8217;s going on at the human level.  How many of those 40%+ 3pt. teams, for example, lost/kept their top three shooters?  My gut tells me personnel changes have as much (or more) to do with shooting percentage changes than do the normative powers of statistical means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarcastic Mike</title>
		<link>http://btn.com/2012/11/09/is-indiana-1/#comment-111107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarcastic Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btn.com/?p=81854#comment-111107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike, I think you make a very reasonable analysis into the possibility of Indiana maintaining their very high 3 point percentage let alone increasing it.  However, if you&#039;ll indulge me in some nitpicking of my own, I&#039;d like to add small point:

As you noted, Marquette was one of those 5 teams that had an improved their 3 point shooting percentage in the year following a 40%+ year.  Correlation is not causation, but the coach of that rare team...Indiana&#039;s Tom Crean.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, I think you make a very reasonable analysis into the possibility of Indiana maintaining their very high 3 point percentage let alone increasing it.  However, if you&#8217;ll indulge me in some nitpicking of my own, I&#8217;d like to add small point:</p>
<p>As you noted, Marquette was one of those 5 teams that had an improved their 3 point shooting percentage in the year following a 40%+ year.  Correlation is not causation, but the coach of that rare team&#8230;Indiana&#8217;s Tom Crean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
