Commissioners reach consensus on playoff plan

(AP) The BCS commissioners reached a consensus Wednesday on a model for a four-team, seeded playoff that will be presented to the university presidents next week for approval.

All that’s left is for the presidents to sign off and major college football’s champion will be decided by playoff come the 2014 season.

The commissioners have been working on reshaping college football’s postseason since January. The meeting Wednesday was the sixth formal get-together of the year. They met for four hours and emerged together with a commitment to stand behind a plan.

[AP: College football closes in on playoff -- finally]

In fact, all 11 commissioners stood shoulder-to-shoulder behind Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick, who pinch-hit for under-the-weather BCS Executive Director Bill Hancock and read the BCS statement from a podium set up in a hotel conference room.

“We are excited to be on the threshold of creating a new postseason structure for college football that builds on the great popularity of our sport,” Swarbrick read.

Though they were stingy about providing specifics of that plan.

They said they were reluctant to share too many details before they had a chance to discuss them with their bosses, the university presidents. Pac-12 Commissioner Larry Scott did say the two semifinals would be worked into the existing major bowls and the site of the national championship game will be bid out similarly to the Super Bowl.

The BCS Presidential Oversight Committee meets Tuesday in Washington, and the commissioners and Swarbrick all stressed that ultimately the decision lies with their bosses. And that the presidents will have more than just one model to talk about.

The Big Ten and Pac-12 presidents have both expressed support for the so-called plus-one model, which gives the BCS a new look by selecting the championship game participants after the bowls are played instead of creating a pair of national semifinals, which is what the commissioners came away from the latest meeting in Chicago backing.

“I’m comfortable both of those will still be discussed at the president’s meeting,” Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany said.

He added: “I think we’re very unified. There are issues that have yet to be finalized.”

The details being debated have been whether to have semifinal sites rotate between the major bowls – Orange, Sugar, Fiesta, Rose and possible others to be added such as the Cotton – or tie the site of the game to which teams were playing in them.

How the teams will be selected has also been up for intense discussion. They have talked about the use of a selection committee and giving some preference to teams that win their conferences.

“I am delighted,” said Southeastern Conference Commissioner Mike Slive, who has supported a four-team playoff for years. “I am pleased with the progress we have made. There are some differences, but we will work them out. We’re trying to do what is in the best interest of the game.”

Find out more about:

1 Comment

Your Opinion?
Show Comments (1 Comment)
Matthew on 6/21/2012 @ 11:00pm EDT Said:

Will these jokers get real, and do what the fans of all conferences want once and for all before I die- I am 42 and tired of people making me wait. 16 teams bump the bowls up a week or two, whatever is needed. Exclude all independents, from this format to alleviate the troubles of the BCS. This is what 98% of the fans want, I realize the money drives the moment, but do your jobs and figure out the best angle to pursue to accomplish both objectives!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Have a question for BTN Customer Service? Please e-mail us here