<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Look ahead to 2012 season: Best of Week 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://btn.com/2012/05/22/looking-ahead-to-the-2012-season-best-of-week-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://btn.com/2012/05/22/looking-ahead-to-the-2012-season-best-of-week-2/</link>
	<description>BTN.com is the official Big Ten sports site of TV&#039;s Big Ten Network.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:20:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://btn.com/2012/05/22/looking-ahead-to-the-2012-season-best-of-week-2/#comment-12174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btn.com/?p=53548#comment-12174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The thing is, M loses 3 starters on the D-line, which made the secondary look better than it actually was.  We&#039;ll see how much of a letdown they have because Alabama is just nasty, they&#039;re gonna do whatever they want vs M]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is, M loses 3 starters on the D-line, which made the secondary look better than it actually was.  We&#8217;ll see how much of a letdown they have because Alabama is just nasty, they&#8217;re gonna do whatever they want vs M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rensational (@rensational)</title>
		<link>http://btn.com/2012/05/22/looking-ahead-to-the-2012-season-best-of-week-2/#comment-12166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rensational (@rensational)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 01:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btn.com/?p=53548#comment-12166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Michigan will be okay. Michigan had more trouble last season with the pass than with the run. It&#039;s a different type of offensive attack and Michigan definitely would have been in trouble with a defense more like 2009-2010, but I&#039;d expect Mattison to have the D ready for AF.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Michigan will be okay. Michigan had more trouble last season with the pass than with the run. It&#8217;s a different type of offensive attack and Michigan definitely would have been in trouble with a defense more like 2009-2010, but I&#8217;d expect Mattison to have the D ready for AF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://btn.com/2012/05/22/looking-ahead-to-the-2012-season-best-of-week-2/#comment-12124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 23:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btn.com/?p=53548#comment-12124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michigan is in trouble.  After Alabama gets done smacking them around they face a very dangerous AF team.  It is at home but AF will give M all they can handle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michigan is in trouble.  After Alabama gets done smacking them around they face a very dangerous AF team.  It is at home but AF will give M all they can handle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
