Big Ten Geeks: Homework

It’s early in the conference season, but not so early that teams don’t have something they need to work on. To get them in shape, let’s hand out some homework assignments.

Illinois: Yes, this team can defend. Even when its opponent shoots 59 percent from two-point range (as Nebraska did on Saturday), the Illini will usually hold the other side to under a point per possession. But can they score? In conference play, Illinois has yet to score over a point per possession. A big part of that is the dropoff of the big man, Meyers Leonard:

   Two-point percentage       Shot percentage       Turnover percentage
Non-conference games 62.4 21.3 17.9
Conference games 55.6 18.5 26.6

Leonard’s production in the conference season has gone into a tailspin, which is bad news for a team that already struggles to score. If Illinois is to get its offense on track, Leonard needs to get back on track.

Indiana: Yes, the Hoosiers are much-improved (indeed, they’ll likely sport a top-10 ranking when sport’s most meaningless polls come out for this week), but all is not well in Bloomington. While Tom Crean’s team can score, it also sports the worst defense in the entire Big Ten. No, really–no team has given up more points per possession than the Hoosiers. So while IU held off Penn State on the road, it should be a warning sign that the Hoosiers sweated out a close game in which they shot 75% on very frequent three-pointers. It should also be noted that Indiana went to the line 32 times in a game that saw them attempt just 23 two-point shots. Quite obviously, these stats sit toward to the more extreme side, and are usually indicative of a blowout win. But this was a real battle, in large part because the Hoosiers allowed Penn State to score at 1.15 points per possession. The Nittany Lion offense is usually “Tim Frazier, and, uh, Bueller?”, so it’s not a great sign that they scored almost at will. Of course, given PSU’s steamrolling of Purdue, maybe Pat Chambers just has Indiana schools figured out.

Wisconsin: Considering this a three-point heavy offense, it’s a bit of a minor miracle that the Badgers are scoring at over a point per possession in conference play despite making only 29 percent of their three-pointers. Against Michigan though, outside shooting was not the problem. Wisconsin made a respectable 37 percent of those, but converted an abysmal 28 percent of shots taken inside the arc. Bo Ryan’s team has thus dropped its third straight game, and is staring down a trip to West Lafayette. It seems unfathomable, but if the Badgers don’t get back on track against Purdue, they’ll be at 6 losses with three games against Ohio State and Michigan State still remaining. I hate saying it, but it might be time to break out the dreaded “B-word.” The offense desperately needs to break out of its funk, and that happens when Wisconsin is back to making perimeter shots early and often.

Iowa: I really like how the young Hawkeyes score. Melsahn Basabe, Aaron White, Roy Marble, Zach McCabe, and Josh Oglesby represents a solid core that could be part of the next Hawkeye team that makes the Dance. Sure, that offense was humbled against Ohio State, but sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes, well, he eats you. What concerns me, however, is how easily Iowa opponents are scoring. Big Ten teams are scoring at a 1.05 PPP clip against Iowa, and that’s while shooting under 25 percent from long distance. Defensive three-point accuracy is generally something that’s not entirely within the defense’s actual control, which is another way of saying that Iowa’s defense is due to get worse once its luck starts to even out.

Minnesota: Not too long ago, I suggested that Minnesota couldn’t shoot. Well, I was right–the Gophers’ offense has largely been ineffective because of their lack of skilled jumpshooters. One possible fix might be for Minnesota to montage themselves into good shooters. More realistically, Tubby Smith’s squad should try to utilize its athleticism and score more going to the hoop. Going into the Purdue game, Minnesota ranked last in the Big Ten in Free Throw Rate, which measures how frequently a team gets to the line. An increase in this number would pay big dividends, as the Gophers also rank as the most accurate free throw shooting team in conference play.

Identifying problems is one thing, actually fixing them is quite another. I’ll leave that to the coaches.


Your Opinion?
Show Comments (4 Comments)
Joey Justice on 1/8/2012 @ 9:25pm EDT Said:

The worst defense “since conference play began.” You left out that important qualifier regarding Indiana. That’s without arguably their best, and unarguably one of their three best, defensive players in Will Sheehey. That’s a bit of an important note to make. On the season, IU has the 23rd best defense in the country, according to Pomeroy (not counting today’s results, which will probably make that ranking fall a bit.).

I’m not saying there isn’t work to do defensively; there most certainly is. The defensive play without Will has been troubling, as an IU fan, especially the way that opponents have been able to get to the rim. Having said that, however, it’s not fair to put too much weight on a grade with cherry picked data.

Indiana won’t have the top defense in the league with or without Will, and probably wouldn’t even have a top three. Wiscy, MSU, and OSU are all among the elite of the elite, and Illinois is very good too. With Will, however, they’re better than most of the other teams in conference, and comparable to Illinois.

I don’t disagree with your main point, not that you in any way need my approval, of course. I just think the way you stated it is a bit hyperbolic.

Don Faust on 1/9/2012 @ 10:17am EDT Said:

This statistic is bogus at best. First of all, basketball is a game of alternating possessions. I score, you get the ball. You score, I get the ball. I can steal it from you (your possession becomes mine), but I cannot steal the ball from myself. So in any given game, the number of possessions for each time will be statistically equal.

Next the points per possession is simply a calculation of the number of points scored divided by the number of possessions in the game. Since we’ve already established that the number of possessions are statistically equal, is this stat simply restating the game score and margin of victory?

Indiana is 3-1 in the BigTen. They have won their four games by a total of 12 points (OSU by 4, Michigan by 2 and PSU by 6). Their loss was by 15 points (to MSU). So it is only reasonable that they are giving up more points per possession than they have scored because they have given up more points than they have scored (by 3).

Indiana needs to improve it’s offensive productivity and improve on it’s defensive effort, as well. But simply winning one more game by more than 3 points will even out the “points per possession” statistic. We’ve still got a long way to go, but we’ve also come a long way already. Don’t rain on our parade.

Brian on 1/10/2012 @ 2:45pm EDT Said:

Any time you get an offensive rebound, that counts as another possession. So, no, two teams don’t always have an equal number of possessions at the end of a game.

Josh Reed, Big Ten Geeks on 1/10/2012 @ 3:15pm EDT Said:

@Brian, offensive rebounds do not count as additional possessions, at least not in most tempo-free circles.

@Don, the post was simply focused on defense. While Indiana’s offense is in fine shape and has (and will) win them a lot of games this year, so far the defense looks like it could use some work. It’s true that they’ve had a tough slate to begin conference play, but giving up 82 points to lowly Penn State should be cause for some concern.