Comments on: Dienhart: Breaking down the Sugar Bowl

By: mhomer

mhomer — Wed, 04 Jan 2012 15:59:15 +0000

give props to tech for having a great game plan and playing a very good game. i think that was the worst Michigan’s offense has looked this season.

By: mhomer

mhomer — Wed, 04 Jan 2012 15:57:11 +0000

not only was the ball not secure, he was clearly out of bounds when he first touched the ground. I can’t believe that the referee standing right there with a great view of it called it a touchdown. At least they made the right decision after that.

By: Carla

Carla — Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:38:35 +0000

I live in Washington, DC and even out here people aren’t agreeing with Willard. The ball touched the ground so it wasn’t deemed a catch. Furthermore, the Wolverines outplayed the Hokies and VT had a big reputation of choking in the big games. This Sugar Bowl wasn’t an exception.

By: Tom Dienhart, BTN.com Senior Writer

Tom Dienhart, BTN.com Senior Writer — Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:08:38 +0000

I don’t think so. To me, the tip of the ball hit the ground while not being totally seucure. Rather than that being the issue, Tech’s biggest problem was special teams breakdowns. FOUR of them!!

By: Willard Bennett

Willard Bennett — Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:58:30 +0000

The Hokies got totally screwed in front of a national television audience. In Overtime that was clearly a good touchdown that was overturned.I guess as long as there is corruption ang greed there will always be somebody willing to look the other way for the right amount of money. Last year Calvin Johnson, this year the Hokies.